Almost all modern running shoes are designed with massive amounts of cushioning and stabilization features in the heel in order to facilitate running with a heel strike. But if you look at the top finishers in a race of any distance from 100m to marathon the competitors are wearing what are called "racing flats," which have absolutely no heel cushioning, and no stabilization features. And the runners all run with a forefoot strike. What's up with this?
We have a lot of folks at CrossFit Atlanta who don't like to run because it hurts their knees, or their back, or causes some other injury process. In every case we find that they are running with a heel strike, and in every case the pain and discomfort goes away when we teach them to start running with a forefoot strike.
When running with a heel strike, a straight leg projects out in front of the runner at the moment of ground contact, and there is at that moment a ballistic load of several times body weight transmitted from the heel to the ankle, thence to the knee, the hip, and the back. There is also a jolting, braking action with each such step.
When running with a forefoot strike, the runner's foot makes ground contact directly under the body with bent ankle, bent knee, and a slightly open hip joint. There is no braking or jolting force. This is a natural shock absorption mechanism designed by 500,000 years of evolution.
An easy way to convince yourself that forefoot running is natural and heel strike running is unnatural is to go to a grass surface, take off your shoes and run barefoot. When barefoot it is painful and almost impossible to run with a heel strike.
There is a wealth of information on this subject on the internet. Google "Barefoot Running" and you'll come up with hundreds of websites dedicated to this most natural way of running. The Pose Method advocates a forefoot strike and sells instructional materials and seminars on how to develop a forefoot running style. Their discussion board is an excellent resource for finding racing flats and shoes that suit this style. The best free resource is the Gordon Pirie website. Pirie was an Olympic medalist in 5,000m at the 1956 Olympics in Melbourne, Aus. He later coached Olympic medalists at all distances up to marathon. He was the original consultant to Adi Dassler in the design of the early Addidas shoes. Pirie was a vigorous advocate of forefoot strike running, and presents a powerful argument that heel strike running is dangerous. His book, "Running Fast & Injury Free" is a free download at the website. Chapter 3 contains his analysis of running mechanics, and discussion of the history of how the faddish heel cushioning, heel strike shoes came to dominate the industry. Highly recommended.
If you are switching from heel to forefoot you will experience soreness in the calves until they get strong enough to go the distance. Jumping rope is excellent training to facilitate forefoot running.
I find it irritating when people say that most of the top finishers in elite racers run with a forfoot strike. If you look at the 2004 and 2008 marathon races you'll see that most of the top finisgers are heel strikers. My observation is that if you look at the top finishers in almost all elite races, you'll in fact see that they are heel strikers, including the African runners.
Everyone who is for forefoot striking talks about running barefoot on grass to see how your foot strikes, however, I have never seen anyone running barefoot on tarmac roads or concrete pavements.
Posted by: Jimmy | December 29, 2008 at 06:01 AM
Actually Jimmy I did watch the Olympic Marathons, men & women, pretty closely in both 2004 & 2008, as well as the Peachtree Road Race the last several years with a view to watching foot strike. You're just wrong. The strongest of the heel strikers in both the men's and women's races this year fell off the pace around 20 miles. In fact, I could predict who would fall out by their running style. The Africans, all of who grew up running barefooted, are forefoot strikers.
Do an experiment--take your shoes off and go for a run barefooted. The ONLY thing that makes heel strike running possible is the modern running shoe. Run heel strike without a modern shoe and you'll hurt yourself bad and quickly.
Posted by: Dan MacD | December 29, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Jimmy, what you are talking about doesn't exist on the level you are stating that it exists on. I've not only watched the olympics and events like marathons, and triathlons, and ultra marathons, I've seen the changes and differences in a lot of people changing from heel striking to Ball of Foot strike. There is absolutely no research that I am aware of that backs up what you are talking about either, yet, I can find plenty of studies that prove BOF strike is not only more efficient, but will make you less susceptible to injuries. Do your self a favor and get Bio-mechanics of Running by Peter Cavanaugh, there is more information than you'll know what to do with. Beware that you'll need to have an understanding of physics and mechanics... Not to say you don't! But your statements are alluding us to assume you don't understand that a heel strike would slow the runner down, as the foot isn't designed to roll through. That will remove muscle elasticity and ground reaction from the equation... These are 2 of the five important things associated with running... Muscle contraction (which will only be increased and require more energy w/ a heel strike), torque, and momentum are the other factors. You are removing these from a system that needs to be in balance. Just because some people do it doesn't make it right! This is something most people don't understand.
Posted by: BMack | December 29, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Funnily enough Dan and BMack I've been forefoot running the past year and it definately has made a difference. I have worked on this vey intently my legs are never sore after a training session and my calves are far stronger and have adapted to this type of running very well. But I still disagree with you Dan regarding the top finishers in the 04 and 08 Olympics. Stefan Baldini is a definate heel striker and one of the worlds top runners, does this mean that if he changes his runing technique to forefoot he will become a better runner? Thanks for the info on Peter Cavanagh BMack, I'll look it up, sounds very interesting. I have also read Gordon Pirie's book which I found excellent and in fact gave me my first insight into running differently and realy made a difference to me. It's vey difficult when so called running experts disagree on whether we should heel strike of forefoot strike. When I was younger I just ran, never had and injury and never thought about running technique. Mind you, the extra weight I've been carrying doesn't help!
Posted by: Jimmy | February 03, 2009 at 08:24 AM
just putting it out there that though forefoot running has made me faster, I have also had shin splints that persist despite custom inserts, bone density scans, weeks of rest, and special exercises. I can date the shin splints back to the week I finally got the hang of forefoot running. not saying forefoot running shouldn't work for everyone else, just saying that though it's made me faster it certainly hasn't kept me injury free.
Posted by: amaeba56 | March 02, 2009 at 10:27 PM